No Meaner Place

November 24, 2009

“Dying is easy, comedy is hard.” A conversation with Jon Sherman.

Neely: Before we get started, can you give me a bit of your background – where you grew up, family, interests, college…you know, “Jon Sherman the Early Years.”

Jon: I grew up in Riverside, though I had very little Southern California influence.  My dad’s originally a New Yorker and my mom is English.  He was a biology professor at the UC campus, while she started as a biologist, then went to law school about the time I was in 7th grade, became a D.A. and eventually a judge – so no show business connections to help me get started.  My younger sister’s a magazine writer and the author of “Frenemies”, a series of  tween novels.  In high school I was pretty geeky (a “Dungeons and Dragons” kid) and then in college I was in the Stanford Marching Band playing trumpet and mellophone; eventually I was in charge of the band.  After college, I started as an assistant on the Paramount lot, which is how I met Ann Blanchard.  At the time she was an agent’s assistant, but when she eventually became an agent, I was her first client.  My parents, though really worried about the instability of my chosen profession, were always incredibly supportive — and by ‘incredibly’ I mean I never totally believed them.

Neely: But you had enormous talent.

Jon: I’ve always felt that you can’t have talent without luck and you can’t have luck without talent.

Neely: You were one of the first present era television writers I became aware of, not because of your amazing skill or talent (neither of which is in question) but because when I was a temp assistant in Fox television Business Affairs I had to process a “blind script” contract that had your name on it.  This was pretty early in your career (“The Preston Episodes” years, or should I say half year) and I had never heard of a “blind script.”  Investigating, I discovered that it meant you were being given money to write a pilot script, essentially of your own choosing.  Wow, I thought, this guy must be really good; and I looked for your name in the credits ever after.  Of course ever after took a while because I can’t honestly say I watched “Sabrina, the Teenage Witch.”  But when you landed screen credit on “The Naked Truth,” I instantly perked up.  So what was that 1995/96 blind script about?

Jon: Honestly, it’s pretty fuzzy.  I think 20th might have been trying to hedge their bets with me and the next job I might take.  I might not have actually written a script, though I did kick some ideas around with David Babcock, who’d been a co-exec on “The Preston Episodes.”

Neely: You created MTV’s first scripted series, “Dead at 21” – how did that happen?

Jon: Ann told me to go pitch them ideas for game shows and action adventures.  So I did, only they didn’t like the ideas because they weren’t “MTV” enough.  I had no idea what that meant, so they explained it to me and told me to go away and come back when I had something that fit their brand.  Now, as most people know, that was just short hand for “go away.”  But I was new and didn’t understand the subtleties so I came up with some ideas I thought would fit and eventually devised “Dead at 21.”  I ended up being a staff writer without any say whatsoever on the show I created and I can’t say it was a very positive experience.  Nevertheless, I did work with some great writers, notably Manny Coto who went on to run “Enterprise” and exec produce “24,” and P.K. Simonds, who worked on “Doogie Howser,” “Party of Five” and now is showrunner on “Ghost Whisperer.”

Neely: I find some irony in the fact that you are a great comedy writer and yet you started in drama (“Dead at 21”) and are back on a one hour drama (“Royal Pains”).

Jon: Comedy has always been my primary love.

Neely: Great comedy writers are quite rare and you have some great credits (for the record, I truly believe what I tell my students, and that is to never sneer at a gig, and that would probably be what “Sabrina the Teenage Witch” falls under).  Tell us a bit about the experience of working on “Sabrina.”

Jon: Actually this never fell into the category of “a gig is a gig.”  I loved working on this show.  Nell Scovell was one of the writers on “The Preston Episodes” and she became my mentor.  After “Preston” went down, Nell got me an interview with Steve Levitan who had a 6 episode order for a show called “Just Shoot Me” and he offered me a job as an Executive Story Editor (the logical next step from where I had been on “The Preston Episodes”).  But then Nell ended up getting a job running “Sabrina the Teenage Witch” because the guy who originally created it and was set to run it was unable to get out of the show he was on and she asked me to come on board.  In the end it was loyalty to Nell and a leap frog to Co-Producer that convinced me to do “Sabrina.”

Neely: Moving on to “The Naked Truth,” any experiences jump to mind?

Jon: “The Naked Truth” was really hard; one of the hardest years I ever had.  The people involved were interesting and very talented but it was a show that never found a footing or could figure out what it was supposed to be.  The hours were horrendous, I had no life, and there was a lot of conflict in the Writers’ Room.  This was my only experience where hostile factions erupted.  It was like bailing water on a ship that was sinking.  This show really burned me out and for the first time I wondered if I had chosen the wrong profession.  It made me question my ability and undermined my confidence.

Neely: “Encore, Encore” was seen by so few and had some of the best writing on television at the time; Ernie Sabella who played Leo the vineyard manager is a personal friend and he loved doing the show.  And who knew that the fabulous Joan Plowright, Olivier’s widow, had such fabulous comedic timing!  I was blown away by James Patrick Stewart’s fake French accent and was totally smitten to learn that he was the son of Chad Stewart, of Chad and Jeremy fame. (What a clash of the demographic groups, especially since I always have to explain that Chad and Jeremy were part of the “British Invasion” singing groups, contemporaneous to the Beatles…and I’ve now targeted myself as a no longer viable demographic group.)  Well, whatever went wrong with that show, it wasn’t the writing.  It also appears to have been the most influential of your career as it brought you to the attention of David Angell, Peter Casey and David Lee.

Jon: Well I think everyone was trying too hard to fit “Encore, Encore” into the “Frasier” mold.  I wasn’t sure a sitcom about opera and wine was what America was craving, but the mentoring on this show put me back in the groove; and, honestly in the back of my head I thought if it didn’t work out, maybe it could lead to a job on “Frasier.”  One outgrowth for me was that I fell in love with wine.  Paramount flew us all on the corporate jet to Napa.  When we got there, I asked Peter Casey who I’d be sharing a room with and he raised an eyebrow, saying “No one.  You’re in the big leagues now.”  I guess I was still that Stanford band geek who was used to sharing a room with 4 other guys.  After “Encore, Encore,” David, Peter and David told me they’d like to put me on “Frasier.”  And then Steve Levitan called and offered me a position on “Stark Raving Mad” and I had to turn him down again.  I would still really like to work with him.

Neely: “Frasier” is probably in my all time favorite top 10 of comedy.  How did that work in the room?

Jon: I was hired by David, Peter and David, but they weren’t in the room on a regular basis; Chris Lloyd and Joe Keenan were running it, so I felt a bit like a redheaded step child.  I had to prove myself to them.  I started in Season 6 and continued to the end of the run in Season 11, eventually moving up to Executive Producer.

Neely: The pressure to write a farce every week must have been enormous pressure.

Jon: It wasn’t all farce.  Joe Keenan’s particular strength was writing farce.  A particular favorite of mine was called “The Ski Lodge” where there are misunderstandings, misinterpretations and lots of slamming doors.  Mostly, though, I think “Frasier” was a character-based comedy with really strong characters and performers.

Neely: Who were your most important comedy influences, both from the standpoint of people you’ve worked with and those whose style or careers you admired as you were coming up?

Jon: Definitely Nell Scovell, as I mentioned earlier.  Also the Grub Street guys, David Angell, Peter Casey, and David Lee, both from the standpoint of comedy and support.  Also Chris Lloyd who was always asking the hard questions – “What makes this funny? Why are we doing this?”  As to early influences I’d cite Peter Tolan who not only wrote on what I consider to be one of the best comedies of all time, “The Larry Sanders Show,” but also wrote some terrific one act plays.  My favorite show growing up was probably “Monty Python.”  I got a healthy dose of British comedy from my English mother.  As a kid I watched everything and loved period piece shows like “When Things Were Rotten.”  In college I was a hard core “Simpsons” fan.  I also liked “Taxi” and “Cheers.”

Neely: It should be noted that when we tried to talk last time, you were a world away; on a train from China to Nepal, about to lose all cell phone and internet contact.  What were you doing there?

Jon: Let me give a little in the way of back story.  The first sitcom I ever worked on was the Margaret Cho comedy called “All American Girl.”  One of the other writers who worked on it, Rita Hsiao, went on to write on a number of Disney projects like “Mulan” and “Toy Story 2.”  She was contacted by an independent Chinese production company to write an animated feature based on a Chinese comic entitled Tibetan Rockdog and we’re working together on it.  The Chinese production company wants to do it totally independently and control distribution.  They wanted us to come to China and Tibet to get a feel for the area culturally and visually.  Our job on that trip was to enjoy the landscape.  We’re in the outline stage at this point.  I’m going to Rita’s place to work on it later this morning.

Neely: Like many of your colleagues, you’ve jumped to one hour drama with “Royal Pains” on USA.  Is the writing process different?  What are the similarities?

Jon: The writing process is very different.  Comedy is easier to break and harder to write.  Drama is harder to break and easier to write.  There are only so many things in the moment that can happen in drama.  A comedy writer I once worked with said, “if a kid gets kidnapped in the first 5 minutes everyone agrees it’s dramatic.  But nobody agrees what’s funny.”

Neely: This gives me the perfect opportunity to repeat a quote variously attributed to George Bernard Shaw, Edmund Gwen, Donald Wolfit or Edmund Kean when asked about imminent death – “Dying is easy.  Comedy is hard.”  Now not to ignore the elephant in the room, but let’s talk a bit about “The Compleat Pratt.”  Does anyone get it?

Jon: Yes, some people have gotten it. But mostly I’ve found that people either love it or don’t get it. 

Neely: I have to tell you that whenever I taught coverage to any of our PAs or assistants, I would use “The Compleat Pratt” as my successful comedy example.  It worked well until one day when a particularly bright PA who had recently graduated from UCLA in playwrighting handed the script back to me indicating that it had disappointed him.  Surprised and perplexed, I asked him why and he responded that he “would have liked to have seen what Tom Stoppard would have done with the material.”  Dumbfounded, my only response to him was that there were two words I didn’t want to hear when discussing situation comedy – “Tom” and “Stoppard.”

Jon: Well, actually I would love to see what Stoppard would do with the material.  His writing has been a big influence.  Do you think maybe I could get him to do a polish on it?

Neely: What are you working on now?

Jon: Besides the movie, I’ll be going back full time on “Royal Pains.”  I have a very full plate right now and don’t want to spread myself too thin.

Neely: Talking to you was an enormous pleasure and exceeded my already very high expectations.  Thank you so much for taking the time.

November 18, 2009

Given a choice between charging elephants and development season, I’ll still choose No Meaner Place.

Filed under: Conversations With, Pilots, Produced, Todd, Writers — Tags: , , , — Neely Swanson @ 9:10 am

What if the Buddies are girls?

“Soccer Moms” by Donald Todd

What: An upscale neighborhood is being systematically robbed; the disappearance of an illegal maid threatens to upend the campaign of a local politician; and a “June Cleaver” soccer mom has too much time on her hands.

Who: Brooke Benning, the perfect suburban mom we all wanted as kids and hate as adults, was running her own one-woman neighborhood watch even before her neighbors were being robbed blind in a series of daring daylight robberies.  Curious, some would say nosey, by nature, Brooke takes a walk each evening, strolling the neighborhood, a habit her husband calls spying.

Ed: …you’re one step from turning into Mrs. Kravitz from “Bewitched”.

Brooke: To be fair to Mrs. Kravitz, there was a witch next door.  And Darrin did turn into a monkey.

This particular evening she spies a beat up Volvo that doesn’t belong in the area.  Taking things into her own hands she harasses its inhabitants – Dana, a mom, and her two kids, Jack and Molly.  Not only does Brooke force them to leave but she also reports the license to the police.  Imagine her chagrin the next day at the local elementary school when Dana, a fellow mother at the school, confronts her.  Dana, an ex-cop whose husband is in jail for fraud, is now a private investigator and Brooke had interrupted her stake-out, her livelihood.  Furthermore, because Brooke had reported Dana’s car, Dana is no longer able to enter the neighborhood and finish her job.

Brooke: You were on a job?  Who were you watching?

Dana: (showing her card) See the “private” in “private investigator?” That stands for “private.”

At this point, both worlds collide as Dana’s son runs up to her and reminds her that she forgot to make him a lunch.

Brooke: Here – I made an extra lunch, he can have that.

Dana: …What do you mean, you made an “extra” lunch?  Who packs a spare lunch, that doesn’t even make sense.

Very remorseful, and extremely intrigued, Brooke offers to lend her the family van and takes care of Dana’s children while she works.  Unable to resist the call of the gumshoe, Brooke visits Dana on her stakeout (bringing a plate of dinner and calling attention to herself yet again).

Brooke: Okay, you’re watching the meeting, so whoever you’re sitting on must be inside, am I right?  I bet I can guess.  Is it Daniel Haven?  Because I always thought there was something funny about how he suddenly “came into” the money to put in that pool.

Dana: I’m sorry, did you say “sitting on?”

Brooke: I know the lingo.  So who’s the mark?

Dana: (laughs; tough talk) The mark? No can do, sister – I rat out the mark, they’ll lam it outta here toot suite.

Brooke: (embarrassed) Never mind. (They sit in silence, as Dana eats.  Beat.)  Okay, I’m already bored.  How do you do this?  And where do you go to the bathroom?

If Oscar and Felix of “The Odd Couple” were women, they would be Brooke and Dana, although unlike Felix, and potentially more annoying, Brooke is preternaturally perky; but even though we all hate perky, it’s impossible not to like Brooke.

Dana: Oh, god, don’t tell me – you’re one of those families that eat around the table every night.

Brooke: Yes, we are.  I think a family should all talk to one another at dinner.

Dana: Then how do you hear the TV?

Brooke soon finds a new case for Dana, one which Dana, when she sees the $2,000 retainer, is unable to refuse.  Dana, grateful, falls into that syrupy trap of “be careful what you wish for.”  Enormously pleased with herself, Brooke soon insinuates herself into the case and Dana’s life.

No Meaner Place: Again, this wonderful script was produced as a pilot…over and out.  I have no idea what happened, but whatever it was, it wasn’t the writing.  Crisp, funny, with clearly defined and visualized characters (Shelly Long and Bette Midler played similar characters to perfection in “Outrageous Fortune” in 1987); a male-dominated genre written perfectly with originality for women with the potential for endless stories told humorously.  For any woman who has ever had to find her fulfillment as a suburban soccer mom, this is Walter Middy-land with that sexy bit of danger.  To a certain extent, each of us wants the potential excitement of Dana’s life and some (god knows not all) the perfection of Brooke.  There are those of you out there (you know who you are) who always brought extra orange sections to the games in case, god forbid, that week’s soccer mom brought apple slices instead.

Todd is skilled at understanding the vulnerabilities and traps into which middle class women often find themselves.  He has always written interesting female characters, most recently on “Samantha Who?” and “Ugly Betty;” as well as another unproduced pilot entitled “Robin’s Nest.”

I could care less if a network or studio stays ahead of the curve or behind it.  It’s useless to anticipate what the audience will want.  Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue (that would have to be on cable), but do it well and let the audience decide.  The audience will often surprise you.  Why program for 14 year old boys?  This isn’t the tentpole business where you only need two weekends and a lot of noise and special effects; 14 year old boys aren’t watching TV and “Knight Rider” didn’t bring them back.  I’m watching TV and eventually advertisers will learn, if they haven’t already, that brand loyalty is a thing of the past and they should aim for that part of the audience that still has money to spend. This is a show I want to see and if the first pilot didn’t work, for whatever reason, do it over!

Life Lessons for Writers:  Beware the Upset Price and negotiate your separated rights (it can’t be said too many times) because as near as I can calculate, if they still exist those rights to “Soccer Moms” should be reverting any day now, allowing for a return to the market.

Conversation with the Writer:

Neely: I have been a big fan for a long time.  Everyone I’ve talked to absolutely loves you, something that is rare in this business.

Don: Keep digging, you’ll find plenty of detractors.  It’s always that way, some people love you, some people don’t.

Neely: Your comedy bona fides are incredible dating back to “Alf.”  You’ve come a long way – please tell us how you got started in the serious business of comedy.

Don:  It was like the Butterfly Effect – how small actions on one side of the globe create huge changes on the other.  In my case, I was cold one night. I was a staff writer on a show called “Misfits of Science” that was filming out by Magic Mountain.  Staff writer, but more, because we all did everything.  The hours were incredibly long: 16 hours a day; a lot of the filming was outdoors and it was freezing.  One day when we were waiting for Magic Hour (finding just the right lighting for the shot we needed), and all of us cold as hell, I was talking to Burt Brinkerhoff, one of our directors, and he said, “You know, there are jobs where you work indoors all the time.”  I landed the job on “Alf” and didn’t look back.

Neely: Almost all of your credits were in half hour and then you transitioned to one hour.  How did that come about?

Don: Multi-camera shows never alter.  Table read, rehearsal, film in front of an audience; repeat.  It all felt the same and I needed a change.  I was working on “The Hugleys” and realized that I no longer enjoyed the process.  I wondered if it was the show, and would it be any different if I were working on “Friends,” and I realized that it was the format.  So, I wrote a drama spec pilot to show that I could work in one hour and made the jump.  I was lucky enough to write a pilot for Greer Shepherd and Mike Robin entitled “The Boneyard” about an obituary writer. Working with them was a great experience, and by shifting to drama right before the comedy business collapsed, I felt like a stunt man who jumped over the speeding car.  The strategy worked so well, that during the press tour for “Samantha Who?” a critic asked me how a drama writer like myself could hope to write a comedy.

Neely: Any favorite experiences outside of the shows you created?

Don: This is going to sound strange, but one of my best experiences was getting fired off a show.  I created something with Danny Jacobson for the WB called “Simon.”  You never want to get fired, but being sent home and then paid off for the rest of the season is a great job.  I got to spend time with the woman I’d started dating who eventually became my wife.  She was a dancer and I was able to travel with her.  So I owe my life and family to the WB.  “Thanks, WB, sorry you’re dead now.”  I also really liked working on “Dave’s World.”  It was a great writing experience.  Some of the best scripts I ever wrote were written for that show.   Oh and then there was the time Farrah Fawcett handed me a tennis ball.  I was working on “Good Grief” and my bungalow was next to the bungalow of Farrah Fawcett and Ryan O’Neal who were also working on the lot. I watched them batting around a tennis ball and when they were called to set, Farrah turned to me, smiled and tossed me the tennis ball.  And when I was working on “Brother’s Keeper” I got to put Jack Klugman and Tony Randall together for the first time since they did “The Odd Couple.”  We basically cast them as the odd couple.

Neely: You have a gift for writing women.  Any comments or explanations?

Don: Three marriages, maybe.  The “women’s voice” is not  a problem – it’s getting them out that’s the challenge. I started out writing male buddy comedies and then just started writing women because I enjoyed it more.  I really enjoy working with female stars.  I have to say no writer could ever ask for more than to have Christina Applegate and Jean Smart say their lines.  To paraphrase Jim Brooks, “They make me want to be a better writer.” Those two could sell anything, but if the scene isn’t working, it isn’t because of them.

Neely: Let’s talk a bit about “Soccer Moms.”  How did you pitch it and to whom (i.e., did the studios get it, were you under an overall, was there any kind of competition to produce this)?

Don: The idea was pitched by Rick Copp who has written several mystery novels.  Marla Ginsberg got on board and took it to Francie Calfo at ABC. I met with Marla and Francie and liked the idea and wrote the pilot.  Francie was a big supporter of mine.  Like “Soccer Moms,” the idea for “Samantha Who?” also came from a novelist.

Neely: At the studio level, what kind of notes did you get?

Don: It must have been a cooperative experience because I really don’t recall.

Neely: How about at the network level?

Don: I was working on “life as we know it” which was filming in Canada, so the whole development process was over the phone.  And in Canadian, which made it tough.

Neely: In terms of production, how involved were you at the various levels?  Did you have a say in choosing the director?  How about the cast?  How much time did you spend on set?

Don: As the showrunner, I was fully involved.  I spent a lot of time on set, I was there every second — to the extent that it might have even hurt my other project, “Testing Bob” starring Peter Dinklage.  “Soccer Moms” was a satisfying experience all the way up to production; the product didn’t come out right.  Eventually the network wanted to see a very cut down version just to see cast chemistry.  Then I think Steve McPherson accidentally taped the Super Bowl over it.

Neely: Did what happened on this show influence you when you worked on “Samantha Who?”

Don: Any showrunning experience should inform and improve the next one and the bad experiences inform the most.  I learned that I don’t have an interest in working with difficult stars.

Neely: I so love “Soccer Moms” and would still love to see it.  Who owns the rights? If ABC was willing to redo “Eastwick” (and that’s all I’m going to say about that show), do you think there’s any way to convince them to retry this one?

Don: If the network loves a project, then they’ll run with it again.  I’d really hesitate to do “Soccer Moms” at this point.  I have kids and I realized something: if the character has kids in school or at home you can’t put the Mom in real danger and because of that you immediately take away the drama.  If I redid “Soccer Moms” it would have to be very light and no one could carry guns.

Neely: What’s the pilot process like?

Don: The wonderful thing about doing pilots is it’s great for the ego.  During casting, you have people coming in all day telling you how great you are.

Neely: Well onward and upward.  Can you tell me what you’re working on now?

Don: I have two pilots in the works, one for CBS and the other for ABC.  The ABC pilot was my assistant Correne’s idea.  She was a lawyer before trying her hand at writing and she’s co-writing the story; I’ll write the teleplay.  It’s a half hour comedy about Millenials (the 20-26ers).  These are the Trophy Kids the ones who got trophies for anything they did – you know, the “everyone’s a winner” kids.  What happens when these entitled but very happy kids, the largest generation, hits the work place?  The CBS pilot is a domestic comedy about the many versions of me – I’ve been single, married, divorced, married, divorced, married, a stepfather, an adoptive father, a biological father, and so on.

Neely: I’ll look forward to reading and seeing those shows.

Powered by WordPress